The test always correspond to those claims, and who refuses to
Posted by Manuel Casal | Section "Nulla dies sine linea" - The phrase of the day
Constitutions of Catalonia Volume 1, Book 3, Title 15 Usatge affirmantes (Cc. 1.3.15)
* TSJC Ruling dated 11/1/01, RJ 1537, in relation to the burden of proof.
* TSJC Ruling dated 12/7/01, RJ 1606, in relation to the burden of proof on the plaintiff, that in the absence of proof means of defending the acquittal.
* Judgment dated 18/10/01 TSJC, RJ 1636, regarding the evidence of the cost of professional fees.
* TSJC Ruling dated 24/1/02, RJ 1740, in relation to the burden of proof by the plaintiff.
* TSJC Ruling dated 21/2/02, RJ 1747, in relation to the burden of proof.
* TSJC Ruling dated 11/7/02, RJ 1804, in relation to the burden of proof in terms of sustaining the exception, in view of the top culprits excipiendo fit actor (exceptions that the defendant becomes an actor) and if it does the action is successful, then try corresponds to those states, not those who refuse.
* Judgment dated 19/12/02 TSJC, RJ 1863, in relation to the burden of proof.
* TSJC Ruling dated 23/9/04, RJ 2240, in relation to the burden of proof.
* TSJC Ruling dated 9/6/05, RJ 2515, in relation to the burden of proof.
Tags: testing
